Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ben H. Rosenthal & Co., Inc. et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; Borin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; and Rubin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator, 1947 — 330 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
General
Ben H. Rosenthal & Co., Inc. et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; Borin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; and Rubin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator
330 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 819.
Ben H. Rosenthal & Co., Inc. et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; Borin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator; and Rubin et al. v. Porter, Price Administrator.
No. 820.
No. 821.
March 3, 1947.
W. B. Harrell and J. Manuel Hoppenstein for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Emergency Court of Appeals dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioners.