Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Marcus et al. v. New York; Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Benson, Commissioner oF Revenue; Swarthout v. Olund; Basyap, Inc., et al. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency et al.; Hutter et ux. v. City of Chicago; Reilly v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc., et al.; Richerson v. United States; Nix v. United States; Houp v. United States; Hitchcock v. Gomes, Warden, 1973 — 409 U.S. 1119 · caselaw · US