Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stern v. Teeval Co., Inc.; New York v. Teeval Co., Inc.; and Teeval Co., Inc. v. Stern, 1950 — 340 U.S. 876 · caselaw · US
General
Stern v. Teeval Co., Inc.; New York v. Teeval Co., Inc.; and Teeval Co., Inc. v. Stern
340 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 306.
No. 307.
No. 321.
Stern v. Teeval Co., Inc.; New York v. Teeval Co., Inc.; and Teeval Co., Inc. v. Stern.
Eugene J. Morris for petitioner in No. 306. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Abe Wagman, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New York. Robert S. Fougner and Frank 8. Ketcham for the Teeval Co., Inc. John P. McGrath filed a brief for New York City, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition in No. 306.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 301 N. Y. 346, 93 N. E. 2d 884.