Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anthony O'BOYLE, Libelant-Appellee, v. The INTERWATERWAYS NO. 101, Interwater, ways Line, Claimant-Appellant, and Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MATTICK; Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee. INTERWATERWAYS LINE, Inc., Libelant-Appellant, v. Barges FOGGY DEW and Anthony O'BOYLE; Anthony O'Boyle, Claimant-Appellee, Anthony O'Boyle, Respondent-Appellee, and Steam Tug William F. Mattick, Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee, 1928 — 25 F.2d 915 · caselaw · US
General
Anthony O'BOYLE, Libelant-Appellee, v. The INTERWATERWAYS NO. 101, Interwater, ways Line, Claimant-Appellant, and Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MATTICK; Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee. INTERWATERWAYS LINE, Inc., Libelant-Appellant, v. Barges FOGGY DEW and Anthony O'BOYLE; Anthony O'Boyle, Claimant-Appellee, Anthony O'Boyle, Respondent-Appellee, and Steam Tug William F. Mattick, Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee
25 F.2d 915·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anthony O’BOYLE, Libelant-Appellee, v. The INTERWATERWAYS NO. 101, Interwater, ways Line, Claimant-Appellant, and Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MATTICK; Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee. INTERWATERWAYS LINE, Inc., Libelant-Appellant, v. Barges FOGGY DEW and Anthony O’BOYLE; Anthony O’Boyle, Claimant-Appellee, Anthony O’Boyle, Respondent-Appellee, and Steam Tug William F. Mattick, Globe Shipyard, Inc., Claimant-Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 23, 1928.
Nos. 258, 259.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Decrees affirmed. For opinion below, see 25 F. (2d) 913..
J. C. Crawley and Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, all of New York City, for appellant.
H. L. Cheyney and Matthew P. Breen, both of New York City, for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decrees affirmed in open court.