General
Daniel A. Long, Plaintiff in Error, v. John E. Shepard
241 U.S. 652·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 324.
Daniel A. Long, Plaintiff in Error, v. John E. Shepard.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Submitted April 26, 1916.
Decided May 8, 1916.
Mr. Lewis. C. Lawson and Mr. C. Dale Wolfe for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of National Foundry & Pipe Co. v. Oconto Water Works Supply Co., 183 U. S. 216, 237; Vandalia R. R. v. Indiana, 207 U. S. 359, 367; Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Ry., 224 U. S. 268, 270.