Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barbara Rosenberg, Plaintiff, v. Susan S. Wilson, Individually and as Executrix of Adrian Post, Deceased, Respondent, and Charles Rosenberg, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 545 · caselaw · US
General
Barbara Rosenberg, Plaintiff, v. Susan S. Wilson, Individually and as Executrix of Adrian Post, Deceased, Respondent, and Charles Rosenberg, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
189 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Barbara Rosenberg, Plaintiff, v. Susan S. Wilson, Individually and as Executrix of Adrian Post, Deceased, Respondent, and Charles Rosenberg, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Rosenberg v. Wilson, 120 App. Div. 554, affirmed.
(Argued October 1, 1907;
decided October 15, 1907.)
■ Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 11, 1907, which modified' and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term decreeing distribution in surplus money proceedings.
William D. Gaillard for appellant.
Yorlce Allen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.