Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fanny H. Youngs, Individually and as Executrix of Thomas F. Youngs, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Ada C. Youngs, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Graham Youngs, Deceased, Defendant; Graham Youngs et al., Appellants, and Alice E. Nash et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 550 · caselaw · US
General
Fanny H. Youngs, Individually and as Executrix of Thomas F. Youngs, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Ada C. Youngs, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Graham Youngs, Deceased, Defendant; Graham Youngs et al., Appellants, and Alice E. Nash et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
183 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fanny H. Youngs, Individually and as Executrix of Thomas F. Youngs, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Ada C. Youngs, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Graham Youngs, Deceased, Defendant; Graham Youngs et al., Appellants, and Alice E. Nash et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued November 27, 1905;
decided December 15, 1905.)
Youngs v. Youngs, 102 App. Div. 444, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 11,1905, which affirmed a judgment construing the will of Thomas F. Youngs, deceased, and directing a sale of real estate and distribution of the proceeds, entered upon the report of a referee.
Abel Crook, Charles De Kay Townsend and Mortimer S. Brown for appellants.
John M. Bowers and Charles P. Northrop for respondents.
Eliot Norton for Lavine G. Meyer, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.