Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McKenzie v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 1972 — 408 U.S. 916 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McKenzie v. Director, Patuxent Institution
408 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-5040.
McKenzie v. Director, Patuxent Institution.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Petition for rehearing granted and order of November 22, 1971 [404 U. S. 979], denying petition for writ of certiorari vacated. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 407 U. S. 245. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari and reverse in light of McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution, supra.