Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miller & Lux Incorporated v. Anderson et al., 1964 — 375 U.S. 986 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Miller & Lux Incorporated v. Anderson et al.
375 U.S. 986·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 633.
Miller & Lux Incorporated v. Anderson et al.
Dean Acheson and C. Ray Robinson for petitioner. Clayton L. Orn, James D. Adams, Arthur R. Albrecht, Martin J. Weil, Adolph H. Levy, Lloyd M. Tweedt, Marcus Mattson, Harold C. Morton, Marion B. Plant, Herbert W. Clark, Girvan Peck, Edward G. Chandler, Edwin S. Pillsbury, Richard H. Peterson, Paul F. Schlicher, Walter M. Gleason, Joseph M. McLaughlin and Patrick James Kirby for Marathon Oil Co. et al.; Stanley F. Davie for Trico Oil & Gas Co. et al.; and Rodney K. Potter for Lloyd Corporation, Ltd., et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.