Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al., Defendants-Appellees, 1975 — 516 F.2d 1396 · caselaw · US
General
David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al., Defendants-Appellees
516 F.2d 1396·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1975
Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1026, Docket 75-7006.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 1975.
Decided May 30, 1975.
Feldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank — Western and Marine Midland Bank — Rochester.
Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.
Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendant-appellee Union Commerce Bank.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We affirm upon Judge Bonsai’s well considered opinion reported at 382 F.Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y.1974).