Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. CARRERE; UNITED STATES v. GRAFTON, 1853 — 154 U.S. 532 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. CARRERE; UNITED STATES v. GRAFTON
154 U.S. 53238 L. Ed. 1087·Supreme Court of the United States·1853
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. CARRERE. UNITED STATES v. GRAFTON.
APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
Nos. 78 and 80.
Submitted March 1, 1853.
Decided March 3, 1853.
Reversed upon the authority of United States v. Philadelphia é> New Orleans, 11 How. 609.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. Attorney General for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Taney]
Mr. Chief Justice Taney
delivered the opinion of the court. The appellees in these two cases claim title under an instrument of writing which they allege was a grant by the Spanish authorities to the Baron de Bastrop. In the case of The United States v. The Cities of Philadelphia and New Orleans and Livingston and Callender’s Heirs, reported in 11 How. 609, the court decided that this instrument of writing conveyed no title to the Baron de Bastrop; and consequently the petitioners can derive no title to themselves under it.
The decree in each of these cases must therefore be reversed and a mandate issued to the Circuit Court, directing the petitions to be dismissed. Reversed.