Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna Hawley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph W. Walker, Constable, etc., 1914 — 232 U.S. 718 · caselaw · US
General
Anna Hawley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph W. Walker, Constable, etc.
232 U.S. 718·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 217.
Anna Hawley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph W. Walker, Constable, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.
Argued January 30, 1914.
Decided February 24, 1914.
Mr. J. M. Sheets for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Louis D. Brandeis, Mr. Timothy S. Hogan, Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., and Mr. Clarence D. Laylin for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Muller v. Oregon, 208 U. S. 412 ; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78, 79.