General
The Cahill Iron Works, Respondent, v. Francis R. Pemberton, Appellant
168 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Cahill Iron Works, Respondent, v. Francis R. Pemberton, Appellant.
Cahill Iron Works v. Pemberton, 48 App. Div. 468, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1901;
decided October 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment. of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 13,1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a hew trial.
Franlt, SulUvmi Smith and G. Walter Artz for appellant.
James H Oaldwell and Robert R. Reed for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray,Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.