Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Custer, Respondent, v. The Greenpoint Ferry Company, Appellant, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
Administrative
William Custer, Respondent, v. The Greenpoint Ferry Company, Appellant
98 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
RIJGER, Oh. J~, ANDnEWS, MILLER and DANFOETH, JJ., con- cur; RAPALLO, EARL and FINCH, JJ., dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Custer, Respondent, v. The Greenpoint Ferry Company, Appellant.
(Submitted March 3, 1885;
decided March 17, 1885.)
We~rnore cQ~ ~Temner for appe11a~t
Eugene D. Hctwlcine for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
RIJGER, Oh. J~, ANDnEWS, MILLER and DANFOETH, JJ., con- cur; RAPALLO, EARL and FINCH, JJ., dissent.
Order affirmed.