Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bush Terminal Railroad Co. v. Bush Terminal Buildings Co., 1947 — 331 U.S. 843 · caselaw · US
General
Bush Terminal Railroad Co. v. Bush Terminal Buildings Co.
331 U.S. 843·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1310.
Bush Terminal Railroad Co. v. Bush Terminal Buildings Co.
June 9, 1947.
Arthur Garfield Hays, John Schulman and Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioner. Abner J. Grossman, Martin A. Schenck and Charles E. Cotterill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, denied.