Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter W. Gallaudet et al., Appellants, v. Charles Kellogg et al., Respondents, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Peter W. Gallaudet et al., Appellants, v. Charles Kellogg et al., Respondents
133 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter W. Gallaudet et al., Appellants, v. Charles Kellogg et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 29, 1892;
decided June 7, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 16, 1891, which overruled plaintiffs’ exceptions and ordered a judgment in favor of defendants on a verdict •directed by the court,
C. Elliott Mi/nor for appellants,
Joseph H. Choate for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., who reads for reversal, and Peokham and Maynard, JJ,, who concur with him.
Judgment affirmed.