General
Elizabeth Laible, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
162 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Laible, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Laible v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 574, affirmed.
(Argued March 5, 1900;
decided March 27, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 9, 1897, sustaining the plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division after a nonsuit at a Trial Term, and granting a new trial.
Albert H. Harris for appellant.
William S. Jenney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff dn the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.