Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEIDOS, INC., fka SAIC, Inc., petitioner, v. INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., 2017 — 138 S. Ct. 369 · caselaw · US
General
LEIDOS, INC., fka SAIC, Inc., petitioner, v. INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.
138 S. Ct. 369199 L. Ed. 2d 274·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEIDOS, INC., fka SAIC, Inc., petitioner,
v.
INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.
No. 16-581.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 17, 2017.
Joint motion of the parties to remove the case from the argument calendar and hold in abeyance any further proceedings granted.