Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick J. Maeder, Appellant, v. Adolph Wexler, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 519 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick J. Maeder, Appellant, v. Adolph Wexler, Respondent
182 N.Y. 519·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick J. Maeder, Appellant, v. Adolph Wexler, Respondent.
(Submitted May 30, 1905;
decided June 13, 1905.)
Maeder v. Wexler, 98 App. Div. 68, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first j'udicial department, entered November 26, 1904, which reversed an order of the Appel- ■ late Term of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York overruling a demurrer ■ to the reply and sustained such demurrer.
Leonard J. Langbein for appellant.
Payson Merrill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs;'no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.