Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas v. New Mexico et al., 1937 — 302 U.S. 658 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Texas v. New Mexico et al.
302 U.S. 658·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 11,
original.
Texas v. New Mexico et al.
December 20, 1937.
[MAJORITY]
Upon consideration of the motion of the complainant State, presented by Charles Warren, Special Master herein, to defer hearings before the Special Master, and of the communication of the Special Assistant Attorney General of the State of New Mexico stating that the State of New Mexico and the attorneys for the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District agreed to a continuance, it is ordered that further hearings before the Special Master be deferred until April 1, 1938, or such date thereafter as the Special Master shall determine.
Messrs. Richard F. Burges, William McCraw, and H. Grady Chandler for complainant. Messrs. Frank H. Patton, A. T. Hannett, Pearce C. Rodey, and Richard H. Hanna for defendants.