Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Paschall et al. v. Christie-Stewart, Inc., et al.; Connor v. Arkansas; Musser v. United States; Canfield v. Oklahoma; Smith et ux. v. Reeder et ux.; Farkas v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.; Matanky v. United States; Abbott et al. v. United States; Nix v. Grand Lodge of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers; Hernandez v. Brown, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al.; Harvey v. Saulnier et al.; Behring Properties, Inc., et al. v. Sun Oil Co.; Titus v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al.; Hines v. Alabama; Mays v. Warner, Secretary of the Navy; Hull v. St. Elizabeths Hospital et al., 1974 — 414 U.S. 1138 · caselaw · US