Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bank of Salina v. Alvord, 1865 — 32 N.Y. 684 · caselaw · US
General
Bank of Salina v. Alvord
32 N.Y. 684·New York Court of Appeals·1865·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bank of Salina v. Alvord.
, Motion to postpone the argument because of inconvenience of one of the parties.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
A motion is made to postpone the argument of this cause on the ground that it was inconvenient for one of the parties to- prepare for the hearing. Our rules prescribe the only cases in which we can postpone arguments. It is the right of parties who have interests dependent on our decision, to claim that their causes shaE be heard when reached in their regular order upon the calendar.. If the opposite party is unfortunately unprepared, he is at liberty, under the rule, to submit a printed argument. It is better to adhere to the rule than to permit the course of justice to be delayed by the recognition of exceptional causes of postponement, for which no provision is made, and which are necessarily dependent on the exercise of discretion, defined by no regulation, and subject to no limitation.