Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. National City Lines, Inc. et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. National City Lines, Inc. et al.
335 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 269,
Mise.
United States v. National City Lines, Inc. et al.
George T. Washington, then Acting Solicitor General, for the United States.
Marland Gale, C. Frank Reavis and Martin D. Jacobs for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
This case is assigned for hearing on the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari.