Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick B. Russell et al., Appellants, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick B. Russell et al., Appellants
171 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick B. Russell et al., Appellants.
People v. Bussell, 67 App. Div. 620, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted May 6, 1902;
decided May 20, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 20, 1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a summary judgment entered upon a forfeited recognizance.
William G. Cooke for appellants.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of Van Arsdale v. King (155 N. Y. 325); People v. Clark (168 N. Y. 676), and People v. Baker (168 N. Y. 677); no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.