Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Murgatroyd v. McLure, 1800 — 4 U.S. 295 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Murgatroyd v. McLure
4 U.S. 2954 Dall. 295·United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·1800
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Murgatroyd v. McLure.
Illegal contract.
Replevin cannot be maintained for a vessel, by registered owner, who has received the full value of it from another, for whom he is mere trustee, in fraud of the laws of the United States.
Replevin, for the ship Mount Vernon. The defendant claimed property, under a capture and condemnation as prize, in the French Court of Prizes, established at the city of St. Domingo, in the island of St. Domingo, under the circumstances stated in the reports of the trials, relative to the same ship. Murgatroyd v. Crawford, 3 Dall. 491; Duncanson v. McLure, ante, p. 308. After hearing the evidence—
[MAJORITY — Chase, Justice,]
Chase, Justice,
declared, that the whole transaction between Murgairoyd and Duncanson was a mere cover to evade the laws of the United States ; that the former was a mere trustee for the latter; and that having been paid the full price for the ship, he had no property, on which the replevin could be maintained.
The plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.