Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Simon Uhlmann et al., Appellants, v. Nathan Brownell et al., Respondents, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
General
Simon Uhlmann et al., Appellants, v. Nathan Brownell et al., Respondents
121 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Simon Uhlmann et al., Appellants, v. Nathan Brownell et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 13, 1890;
decided April 15, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made November 1Y, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee.
Alex. BlumensUel for appellants.
N. P. Newton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.