Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Alden Speare's Sons Company, Appellant, v. Stewart C. Alger, Respondent, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 582 · caselaw · US
General
The Alden Speare's Sons Company, Appellant, v. Stewart C. Alger, Respondent
185 N.Y. 582·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Alden Speare’s Sons Company, Appellant, v. Stewart C. Alger, Respondent.
Speare’s Sons Co. v. Alger, 103 App. Div. 597, affirmed.
(Argued May 18, 1906;
decided June 5, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 5, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused plaintiff through false representations made by defendant.
William E. Warland for appellant.
George Lawyer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ. Dissenting : Hiscock, J.