Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward Rowe, Respondent, v. Isabel H. Gerry, Appellant, and The East Norwalk Lumber Company et al., Respondents, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Edward Rowe, Respondent, v. Isabel H. Gerry, Appellant, and The East Norwalk Lumber Company et al., Respondents
188 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Rowe, Respondent, v. Isabel H. Gerry, Appellant, and The East Norwalk Lumber Company et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 29, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Rowe v. Gerry, 112 App. Div. 358, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 25; 1906, affirming a_ judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.
Henry G. K. Heath for appellant.
Milo J. White for plaintiff, respondent.
J. Mortimer Bell for defendants, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.