Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Steinmetz v. California State Board of Education et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Steinmetz v. California State Board of Education et al.
351 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or · decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 288,
Misc.
Steinmetz v. California State Board of Education et al.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or
decision of this application.
A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioner. Edmund O. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Richard L. Mayers, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.