Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants
174 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Laura A. Weiant, Respondent, v. The Rockland Lake Trap Rock Company et al., Appellants.
Weiant v. Rockland Lake Trap Rock Co., 61 App. Div. 383, affirmed.
(Argued February 20, 1903;
decided March 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 8, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Wilson Brown, Jr., Irving Brown and Frederick W. Penny for appellants.
William McGcmley, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Cray, J.