Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gilpin v. Semple, 1788 — 1 U.S. 251 · caselaw · US
General
Gilpin v. Semple
1 U.S. 2511 Dall. 251·Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gilpin v. Semple.
Practice. — Rule to lake depositions.
Hallowell moved for a rule to take the depositions if going witnesses, &c., before the return of the writ in this cause.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
It has not been determined, upon argument, though often mentioned at the bar, whether we can grant the rule, before the return of the writ, or not. But it has been the practice to take the deposition, cle bene esse, under a rule, subject to the opinion of the court; and this upon the authority of the case in Sheridan. Notice, however, should be given to the defendant, as no appearance, by attorney, can be yet entered,
See Stotesbury v. Covenhoven, ante, p. 164, and the note to that case.