General
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al.
352 U.S. 997·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 9.
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al.
Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Solicitor General Rankin, H. Brian Holland, then Assistant Attorney General, Assistant Attor ney General Rice and Joseph M. Howard for the United States. Harold A. Smith and Howard Ellis for the Shot-well Manufacturing Co. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States' Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion of Frank J. Huebner to withdraw from opposition to the Government’s petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The motion of Harold A. Smith et al. for leave to withdraw as counsel for Frank J. Huebner is granted. The petition .for writ of certiorari is granted, limited to the issues raised in the amended motion to remand and supplement thereto and the respondents’ answer to the amended motion to remand.