Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary H. Powers, Respondent, v. Everett P. Wheeler et al., Appellants, 1872 — 50 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
Mary H. Powers, Respondent, v. Everett P. Wheeler et al., Appellants
50 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary H. Powers, Respondent, v. Everett P. Wheeler et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 29, 1872;
decided November 12, 1872.)
F. P. Wheeler and F. J. Fithian for the appellants.
I). P. Barnard for the respondent.
This case presented the same questions, and was argued and decided with House v. JaeTcson (mée, p. 161).
[MAJORITY]
Judgment modified and affirmed as modified.
All concur.