Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Marvin, Appellant, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 647 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Marvin, Appellant
144 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Marvin, Appellant.
(Argued November 27, 1894;
decided December 11, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 20, 1894, which affirmed a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of having printed a letter or circular purporting to advertise or offer for sale counterfeit money, entered upon a verdict of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace of the city and county of Hew York.
William F. Howe for appellant.
John D. Lindsay for respondent.
Reported below, 79 Hun, 310.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.