General
Cahn, District Attorney of Nassau County, et al. v. Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee et al.
418 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent and would reverse judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in Spence v. Washington, ante, p. 416.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
July 8, 1974
No. 70-102.
Cahn, District Attorney of Nassau County, et al. v. Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee et al.
[See also No. 70-102, Gwathmey v. Town of East Hampton, infra.]
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from C. A. 2d Cir.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent and would reverse judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in Spence v. Washington, ante, p. 416.