General
John S. Prouty, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, impleaded, etc., Appellant
64 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John S. Prouty, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued February 22, 1876;
decided February 25, 1876.)
James Matthews for the appellant.
Lucien Birdseye for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur ; Andrews, J., not sitting.
Appeal dismissed.