General
David H. Surdam, Respondent, v. John Hudson, Appellant
114 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David H. Surdam, Respondent, v. John Hudson, Appellant.
(Submitted June 3, 1889;
decided June 18, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order-made May 1, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of: plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.
Alex. & A. W. Gumming for appellant.
Canniff & Penrie for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Follett, Oh. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.