Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wayne Transportation Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug P. R. R. No. 32, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant Appellee; Steam Tug MARGARET L. MESECK, Her Engines, etc., Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant, 1927 — 23 F.2d 882 · caselaw · US
General
Wayne Transportation Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug P. R. R. No. 32, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant Appellee; Steam Tug MARGARET L. MESECK, Her Engines, etc., Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant
23 F.2d 882·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wayne Transportation Company, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug P. R. R. No. 32, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant Appellee; Steam Tug MARGARET L. MESECK, Her Engines, etc., Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 19, 1927.
No. 66.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, .of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant appellant.
Thomas E. Twyford, of New York City, for libelant appellee.
Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Eearey, of New York City (Eugene Underwood, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for claimant appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (23 F.[2d] 880) affirmed, with costs.