Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stuart et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al., 1969 — 395 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
Tax
Stuart et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al.
395 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1739,
Misc.
Stuart et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Crombie J. D. Garrett for Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Wallace S. Myers for Fagundes et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.