Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Federal Communications Commission v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.; and Federal Communications Commission v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 1953 — 346 U.S. 808 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Federal Communications Commission v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.; and Federal Communications Commission v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
346 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 117.
No. 118.
No. 119.
Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Federal Communications Commission v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.; and Federal Communications Commission v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Benedict P. Cottone, Richard A. Solomon, J. Roger Wollen-herg and Daniel R. Ohlbaum for appellant. Alfred McCormack and George B. Turner for appellee in No. 117; Paul W. Williams for appellee in No. 118; and Max Freund and Stanley M. Silverberg for appellee in No. 119.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 110 F. Supp. 374.