Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Smith v. United States; Ansell et al. v. United States; Olender v. United States, 1957 — 353 U.S. 989 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Breswick & Co. et al.; Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Smith v. United States; Ansell et al. v. United States; Olender v. United States
353 U.S. 989·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Mr. Justice Whit-taker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 36.
No. 82.
No. 114.
No. 89.
No. 412.
No. 577.
No. 612.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al., Baker, Weeks & Co. et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al., Interstate Commerce Commission v. Breswick & Co. et al., Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Smith v. United States, Ansell et al. v. United States, Olender v. United States,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 151;
ante, p. 151;
ante, p. 151;
ante, p. 180;
352 U. S. 909;
352 U. S. 969; and
352 U. S. 982. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Whit-taker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.