Contracts · MBE-tested
Dugan et al. v. Rank et al.; and City of Fresno v. California et al.
369 U.S. 836·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 366.
No. 606.
Dugan et al. v. Rank et al.; and City of Fresno v. California et al.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Solicitor General Cox, J. William Doolittle, Roger P. Marquis and William H. Veeder for petitioners in No. 366.
John H. Lauten and Claude L. Rowe for petitioner in No. 606 and for respondents in No. 366.
Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States et al., and Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, B. Abbott Goldberg, Denver C. Peckinpah, Adolph Moskowitz, James K. Abercrombie, Irl Davis Brett and J. 0. Reavis for the State of California et al., respondents in No. 606.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 293 F. 2d 340.