General
Quaker Oats Co. v. Pennsylvania
324 U.S. 827·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 873.
Quaker Oats Co. v. Pennsylvania.
March 12, 1945.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 165 ; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U. S. 379; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331; Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501; (2) Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111; Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132; (3) Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-323; (4) Western Live Stock v. Bureau, 303 U. S. 250, 256, and cases cited.
Messrs. W. A. Seifert, Geo. Ross Hull and Roy J. Keefer for appellant.
James H. Duff, Attorney General, and Mr. H. F. Stambaugh for appellee.