Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
May Charman, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles A. Tatum, as Executor of Maria E. Hibbler, Deceased, Appellant and Respondent, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
May Charman, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles A. Tatum, as Executor of Maria E. Hibbler, Deceased, Appellant and Respondent
166 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May Charman, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles A. Tatum, as Executor of Maria E. Hibbler, Deceased, Appellant and Respondent.
Charman v. Tatum, 54 App. Div. 61, affirmed.
(Argued March 4, 1901;
decided March 19, 1901.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 15, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Everett P. Wheeler for plaintiff, respondent and appellant.
John J. Crawford for defendant, appellant and respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, without costs to either party; no opiniom
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Taking no part: Barker, Ch. J.