Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of The Union Stock Yard and Market Company to Vacate Assessment, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of The Union Stock Yard and Market Company to Vacate Assessment
98 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of The Union Stock Yard and Market Company to Vacate Assessment.
(Argued December 9, 1884;
decided January 20, 1885.)
The mem. handed down in this case is as follows:
“We agree with the court below that this case cannot be distinguished from that of Barclay (91N. Y. 430). The propositions now raised were before us upon the same proceedings, and the statutes bearing upon the question were examined. We adhere to the conclusion then reached and think the motion to vacate the assessment was properly denied.
“ The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed.”
Truman H. Baldwin for appellant.
I). J. Bean for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Daneobth, J.,]
Daneobth, J.,
reads mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.