Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
O'BRIEN BROS., Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent Appellee, and MANHATTAN ASH REMOVAL CORPORATION, Respondent Appellee. THE STARLIGHT. THE MORNING LIGHT, 1925 — 7 F.2d 488 · caselaw · US
Corporations
O'BRIEN BROS., Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent Appellee, and MANHATTAN ASH REMOVAL CORPORATION, Respondent Appellee. THE STARLIGHT. THE MORNING LIGHT
7 F.2d 488·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’BRIEN BROS., Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent Appellee, and MANHATTAN ASH REMOVAL CORPORATION, Respondent Appellee. THE STARLIGHT. THE MORNING LIGHT.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 24, 1925.
Nos. 333, 334.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Foley & Martin, of New York City (James A. Martin and Geo. V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
George P. Nicholson, Corp. Counsel, of New York City (Charles J. Carroll, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and John T. Condon, of New York City, of counsel), for City of New York.
Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (George Whitefield Betts, Jr., and H. Victor Crawford, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Manhattan, etc., Corporation.
Before HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY]
PER CURIAM. Decrees (7 E.[2d] 485) affirmed, with costs.