General

OLDHAM v. UNITED STATES

38 F.2d 634·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1930

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

OLDHAM v. UNITED STATES. No. 154. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Feb. 8, 1930. J. Q. A. Harrod and Laynie W. Harrod, both of Oklahoma City, OH., for appellant. Roy St. Lewis, U. S. Atty., Herbert K. Hyde and William Earl Wiles, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of OHahoma City, Okl. Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. G. W. Oldham was convicted and sentenced upon three counts of an information charging violations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and has appealed. Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty is the sole error assigned. We cannot consider this assignment because there is no proper bill of exceptions. Instead, there is a literal transcript of all the proceedings at the trial. Tingley v. United States (C. C. A. 16) 34 F.(2d) 1; Caldwell v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 36 F.(2d) 738; Davis v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 38 F.(2d) 631. The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate will issue forthwith.