Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gregory et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; Kern v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; and Allen et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 979 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Gregory et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; Kern v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; and Allen et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.
359 U.S. 979·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 765.
No. 766.
No. 774.
Gregory et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; Kern v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.; and Allen et al. v. Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.
Walter H. Brown, Jr., John L. Smith and George W. Jaques for petitioners in No. 765.
George Zolotar and Leo T. Wolford for petitioner in No. 766. Robert S. Spilman, Jr. for petitioners in No. 774.
Edward S. Pinney for the Columbia Gas System, Inc., Oscar S. Rosner for the Independent Committee for American Fuel Noteholders, James Park for Harbison, Trustee, and Sel-den S. McNeer and Robert K. Emerson for Williamson, Trustee, respondents.
Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker, David Ferber and Arthur Blasberg, Jr. for the Securities and Exchange Commission, in support of the petitions for writs of certiorari.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: 262 F. 2d 510.