Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. MADRID SUPPLY COMPANY, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1007 · caselaw · US
Tax
Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. MADRID SUPPLY COMPANY
69 F.2d 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. MADRID SUPPLY COMPANY.
No. 1057.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 21, 1934.
Robert H. Jackson, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Hodges, Wilson & Rogers, of Denver, Colo., for respondent.
Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and Me-DERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition dismissed on motion of petitioner.