Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JORDY v. DOWLING CO., 1929 — 30 F.2d 937 · caselaw · US
General
JORDY v. DOWLING CO.
30 F.2d 937·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JORDY v. DOWLING CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 2, 1929.
No. 5492.
S. W. Planche, of Lake Charles, La. (Cline, Planche & Girod, of Lake Charles, La., and Giles J. Patterson, of Jacksonville, Fla., on the brief), for appellant.
Kenneth I. McKay, of Tampa, Fla. (R. W. Withers, M. B. Withers, and Maynard Ramsey, all of Tampa, Fla., on the brief), for appellee.
Before WALKER and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Rehearing denied April 6, 1929.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A reversal is sought in this case because of rulings of the court on objections to evidence and in giving instructions to the jury. The record does not show that any of those rulings was excepted, to. Those rulings not being properly presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.